Family LawToday

Divorce Courtroom Free to Modify Momentary Oral Custody Order

Tennessee youngster custody case abstract and divorce course of.

Lisa Ann Woods Neisler v. Guy Wayne Neisler

The mom on this McMinn County, Tennessee, case filed for divorce in 2019, and requested a restraining order and momentary parenting plan.

The events finally agreed to a disposition, however the trial courtroom declined to approve it till after a Guardian advert Litem was appointed.  Accordingly, the trial courtroom, Decide Lawrence Howard Puckett, entered solely a short lived parenting plan granting equal parenting time.

In the end, the trial courtroom entered a last order naming the mom as the first residential mother or father, with the daddy receiving alternating weekends as his parenting time.  The daddy then appealed to the Tennessee Courtroom of Appeals.  He argued that the sooner momentary order ought to have remained in impact, and that the ultimate judgment was subsequently improper.

The Courtroom of Appeals interpreted the daddy’s argument to be that the trial courtroom lacked subject material jurisdiction to change its earlier oral ruling.  However the Courtroom of Appeals acknowledged that the daddy’s argument confirmed a “basic misunderstanding” of each the regulation and the procedural posture of the case.  Particularly, the appeals courtroom famous that the sooner oral ruling couldn’t have been a last judgment, as a result of no oral pronouncement constitutes a last judgment till made a part of a duly entered written judgment.

On this case, the trial courtroom’s oral ruling was topic to modification at any time till a last written judgment was made.

The appeals courtroom went additional and held that the daddy’s argument was frivolous, in that it was devoid of benefit and had no affordable likelihood of success.  Subsequently, it awarded the mom her legal professional’s charges in defending the attraction.

For these causes, the Courtroom of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the decrease courtroom and remanded the case for a dedication of the mom’s affordable legal professional’s charges.  It additionally taxed the prices of the attraction upon the daddy.

No. E2020–00761-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 13,  2021).

See authentic opinion for precise language.  Authorized citations omitted.

To be taught extra, see Child Custody Laws in Tennessee.

See additionally Tennessee Parenting Plans and Child Support Worksheets: Building a Constructive Future for Your Family that includes examples of parenting plans and youngster assist worksheets from actual instances accessible on

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button